Effects of galactooligosaccharides on maternal gut microbiota, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism and inflammation in pregnancy: A randomized controlled pilot study.

Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023;14:1034266
Full text from:

Plain language summary

During pregnancy, a disordered gut microbiome and abnormal glucose metabolism may be possible mechanisms for pregnancy complications such as gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Different from probiotics, galactooligosaccharides (GOS) is a prebiotic that is not digested and absorbed by the host, but can selectively promote the metabolism and proliferation of beneficial bacteria in the body, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of prebiotic intervention in healthy pregnant women, and conduct a preliminary exploration of the possible benefits for pregnant women. This study was a prospective double-blinded randomised clinical trial involving pregnant women. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group and the intervention group at a 1:1 ratio. Results showed that GOS intervention had no significant effect on reducing the incidence of GDM and improving glucose and lipid metabolism. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in glucose and lipid metabolism levels between GOS group and placebo group. Authors conclude that GOS can be considered as a dietary supplement during pregnancy. However, further clinical studies are needed to strengthen the findings of this study.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gut microbiota of pregnant women change with the gestational week. On the one hand, they participate in the metabolic adaptation of pregnant women. On the other hand, the abnormal composition of gut microbiota of pregnant women is more likely to suffer from gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Therefore, gut microbiota targeted treatment through dietary supplements is particularly important for prevention or treatment. Prebiotic supplements containing galactooligosaccharides (GOS) may be an intervention method, but the effect is still unclear. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of prebiotic intervention in healthy pregnant women during pregnancy, and to explore the possible effects of intervention on pregnant women and the influence on gut microbiota as preliminaries. METHODS After recruitment in first trimester, 52 pregnant women were randomly assigned to receive GOS intervention or placebo containing fructooligosaccharides. 16S rRNA sequencing technology was used to detect the composition, diversity and differential flora of gut microbiota. Lipid metabolism, glucose metabolism and inflammatory factors during pregnancy were also analyzed. RESULTS The adverse symptoms of GOS intervention are mild and relatively safe. For pregnant women, there was no significant difference in the GDM incidence rates and gestational weight gain (GWG) in the GOS group compared with placebo (P > 0.05). Compared with the placebo group, the levels of FPG, TG, TC, HDL-C LDL-C, and IL-6 had no significant difference in GOS group (P > 0.05). For newborns, there was no significant difference between GOS group and placebo group in the following variables including gestational week, birth weight, birth length, head circumference, chest circumference, sex, and delivery mode (P > 0.05). And compared with the placebo group, the GOS group had a higher abundance of Paraprevotella and Dorea, but lower abundance of LachnospiraceaeUCG_001. CONCLUSIONS GOS prebiotics appear to be safe and acceptable for the enrolled pregnancies. Although GOS intervention did not show the robust benefits on glucose and lipid metabolism. However, the intervention had a certain impact on the compostion of gut microbiota. GOS can be considered as a dietary supplement during pregnancy, and further clinical studies are needed to explore this in the future.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Digestive, absorptive and microbiological
Patient Centred Factors : Mediators/Gut microbiota
Environmental Inputs : Nutrients ; Microorganisms
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood ; Stool
Bioactive Substances : Prebiotics

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 3
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata